A typologist observes that in languages with postpositions, the genitive almost always precedes the noun. Which implication regarding language universals most accurately describes this phenomenon?

💡 Explanation

The implication observed is that languages with postpositions tend to exhibit a genitive-noun order, rather than the reverse. This represents implicational universals, because the presence of postpositions suggests a pre-genitive ordering; therefore, languages that have postpositions will likely have pre-genitive word order, rather than other possible arrangements.

• What distinguishes acoustic analysis of fricatives from that of vowels in speech pathology?
• During a negotiation, negotiator A subtly threatens negotiator B's professional reputation—which effect dominates in interpreting this communication?
• Why does blending metaphors from conflicting source domains hinder comprehension within a technical manual?
• In Tokyo Japanese, pitch accent changes during sentence production affect prosodic phrasing. Which mechanism explains why a high-high pitch sequence at a phrase boundary becomes a rising contour?
• Why does semantic satiation induce temporary speech errors in repetitive naming tasks?
• Why does a literary translator often fail to achieve complete cultural equivalence when rendering a novel?