What happens to a database query result when the set theory principle of 'union' combines two tables with completely disjoint sets of primary keys?

💡 Explanation

A 'union' operation, by set theory definition, creates a new set containing all distinct elements from both original sets; because the primary keys are disjoint, no overlap exists, therefore the resulting set contains all elements from both, forming a larger set, rather than filtering or reducing the set.

• An algorithm plots the convex hull of points representing drone flight paths; if two hulls intersect in 3D space, which outcome is most likely?
• In formal language theory, what distinguishes a context-free grammar from a context-sensitive grammar?
• If a distributed database system experiences network partitions leading to subsets of nodes becoming isolated, which outcome regarding ACID properties is most likely to occur?
• Which property ensures a cryptographic hash function's output reveals minimal information about its input?
• If a database employs relational algebra to manage data, which consequence follows when two tables, representing sets, have their common elements extracted using set theory?
• A network of interconnected computers is designed such that every computer is connected to at least 'd' others. Which outcome regarding communication resilience occurs as 'd' increases?