Which structural failure mode was most increased when underminng Roman fortifications during sieges?

💡 Explanation

When undermining, the removal of soil support near the base triggers shear failure because the load-bearing capacity of the stonework concentrates along a weakened plane. Therefore, localized shear increases, rather than creep, buckling, or fatigue which have different timing/stress conditions.

• Which outcome resulted when the Tay Bridge design omitted sufficient cross bracing against lateral forces?
• Which risk increased during siege combat when Roman legionaries undermined enemy fortification walls with tunnels?
• Which mechanism caused inaccuracies in early Islamic astronomical observations using astrolabes during zenith measurements?
• Which benefit primarily resulted from the development of chinampa agriculture by the Aztec civilization in Mesoamerica?
• Which outcome occurred when Roman siege catapults launched projectiles over city walls at shallow angles?
• Which limitation arises when using a brass astrolabe to measure stellar altitudes over decades in a coastal environment?