Live Quiz Arena
🎁 1 Free Round Daily
⚡ Enter ArenaQuestion
← HistoryWhich structural weakness frequently emerged in Roman concrete fortifications during the later empire?
A)Hydrostatic pressure induced cracking
B)Subsidence of foundation materials
C)Erosion of pozzolanic binder with seawater✓
D)Tensile stress concentration around arches
💡 Explanation
When Roman concrete was exposed to seawater, the pozzolanic binder underwent erosion because chloride ions reacted chemically altering the microstructure and compromising strength. Therefore erosion resulted; rather than cracking, subsidence, or stress concentration which arose from entirely different processes or load conditions.
🏆 Up to £1,000 monthly prize pool
Ready for the live challenge? Join the next global round now.
*Terms apply. Skill-based competition.
Related Questions
Browse History →- Which outcome arose with the presence of Roman caltrops strategically placed on roads?
- Which risk increased when early Bronze Age smiths reworked solidified bronze castings?
- Which outcome accelerated Roman ballista projectile velocity by torsion spring development?
- Which structural vulnerability increased in pre-1850 timber bridges subjected to prolonged wetting and drying cycles?
- Which structural problem was frequently encountered when Roman legionary fortresses extended timber ramparts on sloped ground?
- Which outcome arises when traditional chinampa systems experience prolonged, elevated flooding during the rainy season?
