Why does a literary translator face higher risk of criticism for 'domestication' in translation, compared to technical documentation?

💡 Explanation

Literary translation carries a higher risk of criticism for domestication because cultural fidelity weighs significantly in interpreting artistic intent; therefore, altering cultural references leads to perceived misrepresentation rather than strict conversion. Technical documentation values accuracy, rather than cultural nuance.

• Why does a multi-protagonist narrative, when adapted into a single-player video game, often undergo a structural simplification impacting player experience?
• What distinguishes the vocal articulation of retroflex consonants from alveolar consonants?
• Why does a child acquiring English as L1 overgeneralize the regular past tense inflection ('goed' instead of 'went')?
• Why does transcribing speech in a noisy environment require careful acoustic analysis of consonant sounds, especially fricatives and plosives?
• Why does discourse degrade when 'given' information is presented as 'new' within a spoken weather report?
• Why does communication using only emoji fail to convey complex legal arguments online?