Why does a phonological rule targeting vowels sometimes exhibit opacity despite ordered derivation?

💡 Explanation

Ordered derivation should prevent opacity. Counterfeeding creates opacity because a later rule destroys the environment for an earlier rule's application, resulting in surface forms that appear to violate the first rule; therefore, the rule seems opaque rather than transparent because it looks like the output doesn't reflect the rule directly.

• Why does regional dialect variation persist online despite increased exposure?
• Why does a chatbot utilizing a Markov chain exhibit incoherence more readily than one using a transformer network?
• Why does an ambiguous sentence parsed by a statistical machine translation system sometimes yield a semantically incoherent translation?
• Why does speech intelligibility degrade more rapidly with increasing additive noise in cochlear implant users compared to normal-hearing listeners?
• Aphasia patients struggle to retrieve words during spontaneous speech. Which mechanism is most likely impaired to produce this?
• Why does the conceptual blending of 'argument is war' lead to focusing on adversarial aspects rather than collaborative problem-solving?