Why does a spectrogram of speech exhibit broader spectral bandwidth for fricatives compared to vowels?

💡 Explanation

Fricatives are characterized by turbulent airflow through a narrow constriction, causing a wide range of frequencies to be excited; therefore, the spectrogram displays a broader spectrum for fricatives, rather than vowels, because vowels are generated by relatively periodic vocal fold vibration and resonances.

• Why does speech intelligibility degrade more rapidly with increasing additive noise in cochlear implant users compared to normal-hearing listeners?
• What distinguishes the Latin alphabet's adaptability in representing diverse languages compared to purely logographic systems such as ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs?
• Why does coarticulation alter consonant production differently across languages?
• Why does the clarity of historical cuneiform tablets degrade more slowly compared to papyrus scrolls under similar storage conditions?
• A convolutional encoder adds redundancy to transmitted data. Which outcome is MOST directly limited by a severe reduction in this added redundancy?
• Why does spatial reasoning ability differ among cultures with differing grammatical structures that emphasize absolute, rather than relative, frames of reference, exert an influence?