Why does derivational morphology sometimes fail to produce predictable semantic outcomes in language?

💡 Explanation

Derivational morphology's predictable outcomes can be undermined because semantic drift causes affixes to acquire new meanings over time, thereby diverging from their original, compositional roles. This leads to unpredictability in derived word meanings, therefore semantic drift causes unpredictable outcomes, rather than syntactic scope which affects sentence-level interpretation.

• During a negotiation, negotiator A subtly threatens negotiator B's professional reputation—which effect dominates in interpreting this communication?
• Why does a lexicographer utilize corpus linguistics when compiling a dictionary entry, rather than relying solely on personal intuition?
• Why does conceptual metaphor processing recruit sensory-motor areas more intensely when the source domain is embodied?
• A lexicographer includes a sentence, 'The weary traveler yearned for respite,' in a dictionary entry for 'respite.' Which mechanism explains why this example enhances the entry's usefulness?
• Why does reduced cognitive load result in greater fluency in second language speech?
• If speakers of a lexifier language (e.g., French) exhibit incomplete second-language acquisition when interacting regularly with substrate language speakers (e.g., African languages), which consequence follows regarding creole formation?