Why does phonetic blending between consecutive signs increase in signed language when signing rate increases?

💡 Explanation

When signing rate increases, the articulators have less time to reach target positions, leading to articulatory undershoot, because completing each gesture fully becomes temporally costly. This maximization of temporal efficiency leads to phonetic blending; therefore, undershoot dominates rather than precise articulation, causing increased phonetic blending.

• If a sign language user attempts to describe a complex, multi-stage manufacturing process using only spatial grammar within a video call characterized by significant latency, which consequence follows?
• If a non-native English speaker, unfamiliar with business jargon, misinterprets a common idiom such as "boiling the ocean" during a crucial negotiation, which consequence follows?
• In American Sign Language, why does assimilation impact the articulation of sequential signs?
• Why does a 'euphemism treadmill' often lead to the original taboo term becoming re-stigmatized within sociolinguistics?
• In a noisy communication channel transmitting Huffman-encoded data, which error correction coding strategy effectively balances added redundancy with improved decoding accuracy without exceeding the channel capacity?
• Why does native-like fluency emerge in second language acquisition following extensive exposure to and practice with common phrases and sentence stems?