Why does reconstructing proto-languages from attested daughter languages using the comparative method become increasingly uncertain as the time depth increases?

💡 Explanation

Reconstruction becomes more challenging with increased time depth because the effects of cumulative sound change obscure the regular sound correspondences between cognates, which are essential for accurate reconstruction. The regular sound correspondence mechanism degrades over time; therefore, correct reconstruction diminishes, rather than from borrowing or semantic change alone.

• Why does a top-down computational parsing algorithm, using a context-free grammar, sometimes exhibit exponential time complexity when processing a highly ambiguous sentence?
• Why does an email request like "Can you possibly review this report by tomorrow?" often lead to slower response than "Please review this report by tomorrow!"?
• A software engineer integrates multiple microservices. Which failure mode becomes likely when inter-service communication lacks explicit message schemas?
• Why does phonetic adaptation by L1 speakers degrade intelligibility in L2 writing systems with shallow orthography?
• If a linguist aims to identify subtle shifts in verb tense usage within a large corpus of historical English novels, which consequence regarding analysis method is most likely?
• Why does spatial reasoning exhibit variations across cultures, considering language relativity in map-reading tasks?