Why does semantic bleaching in grammaticalization lead to seemingly weaker pragmatic effects over time?

💡 Explanation

Semantic bleaching causes the original, stronger meaning of a word to fade as it becomes a grammatical marker; therefore, the pragmatic effects seem weaker because the original lexical content is no longer as salient, rather than speakers resisting the change or phonetic reduction playing a primary role.

• A morpheme-parsing algorithm encounters the word 'unbreakable' – which process explains why the algorithm correctly identifies 'break' as the root, despite the presence of multiple affixes?
• Why does neural coding in the auditory cortex exhibit sparseness, where only a small subset of neurons respond strongly to a given sound, rather than a broad activation?
• An individual with dysarthria struggles to produce clear consonants due to impaired motor control affecting tongue movement. Which compensatory mechanism is MOST likely to improve consonant intelligibility?
• Why does the iconicity of gestures decrease during rapid, multi-party conversations?
• In a long-form improvisational narrative, which risk increases as scene partners continually introduce high-stakes conflicts without providing opportunities for resolution?
• Why does a garden-path sentence like, 'The old man the boats,' initially cause processing difficulty for readers?