Within Mandarin Chinese, why do some instances of tone sandhi unexpectedly fail to apply at a prosodic domain boundary?

💡 Explanation

Tone sandhi fails at domain boundaries because the presence of a higher-level prosodic boundary, such as an intonational phrase, blocks the application of the tone sandhi rule. This is because prosodic hierarchy constraints outweigh local tonal coarticulation, therefore sandhi is prevented rather than overriding the higher-level intonational structure.

• Why does a statistical parser, employed in computational linguistics, sometimes select an incorrect parse tree for a grammatically valid sentence?
• During speech, what acoustic process explains listeners' ability to distinguish between /b/ and /d/ even when the consonant burst is masked by noise?
• Why does a multi-protagonist narrative, when adapted into a single-player video game, often undergo a structural simplification impacting player experience?
• Why does a film narrative dependent on unreliable narration typically undermine character identification, even when executed with high production values?
• Why does mapping the abstract 'argument' domain onto the 'war' conceptual frame often fail to achieve persuasion within a target audience?
• Why does software localization employing aggressive domestication risk reducing brand recognition in a new market?