If a child raised without linguistic input before puberty begins learning a language, which consequence most likely follows?

💡 Explanation

Because the critical period hypothesis suggests language acquisition relies on brain plasticity during childhood, the absence of early input limits full competence in universal grammar. Therefore, grammatical competence suffers, rather than complete proficiency, due to diminished neural plasticity.

• During a negotiation, negotiator A subtly threatens negotiator B's professional reputation—which effect dominates in interpreting this communication?
• Why does a statistical parser exhibit decreased accuracy when processing sentences from social media, as opposed to formal news articles?
• Why does semantic drift in technical jargon undermine effective communication within engineering teams?
• Why does reduced cognitive load result in greater fluency in second language speech?
• Why does native-like fluency emerge in second language acquisition following extensive exposure to and practice with common phrases and sentence stems?
• During literary translation, why does a translator choose domestication, even when the original text contains culturally specific references that might be unfamiliar to the target audience?