During the reconstruction of Proto-Germanic, what outcome is most likely if the comparative method is applied rigorously but linguists fail to account for substrate influence from pre-Germanic languages?

💡 Explanation

Substrate influence involves the imposition of phonetic or grammatical features from a prior language. Failing to account for this during reconstruction will lead to an inaccurate phoneme inventory because the sound correspondences will be misinterpreted, therefore the reconstruction reflects the substrate, rather than the true proto-language, rather than internal sound changes.

• Why does anaphora resolution in spoken dialogue systems often fail when processing deictic expressions?
• Why does a person comprehend 'a heated debate' using temperature concepts?
• A remote island community experiences sustained contact between English-speaking traders and speakers of a local Austronesian language; if a stable creole emerges, which consequence is most likely?
• If a non-native speaker learning English misinterprets the idiom 'break a leg' literally before a performance, which consequence follows?
• What causes speakers to gradually shift phonetic features toward those of a socially admired dialect?
• If a First Nations language with few remaining fluent speakers is taught only through sporadic online lessons to diaspora youth, which consequence is most likely?